various articles that appear in the newspapers that lists all (or most) points of the Reform Gelmini: here's an example .
Articles that list but do not assume any of the consequences of these reforms. Why not think? Why only list? Why not have your say?
Why should a minister do the will of those who voted (in some ways it is), does not care about the reactions taking place in schools as a tank and goes on to state his wishes? Why not listen to the thousands of voices that are raising the school?
us ask then what will happen to 87,400 people lose their jobs.
Domandicamoci what will happen after the return of a single teacher.
ask ourselves .... and ponder.
The thing that worries me most sono i tagli del personale e di che fine faranno le persone che perderanno il lavoro e le conseguenze di questo in una famiglia. Spesso le liti "in casa" nascono a causa di una precarietà economica.
E mi domando anche: come verranno decise le persone da "mandare a casa"? Tramite il "saper fare" o tramite l'"anzianità" o altro? Perché anche questo avrà delle conseguenze.
Si parla tanto della "qualità della scuola". Ma ci si è domandati la parola "qualità" come si traduce nel concreto del contensto scuola? Ci si è domandati come deve insegnare un maestro, un'insegnante, un adulto. Badare bene, non cosa insegnare ma come .
1 mestro per class
30 children per class
87,400 teachers fired
44,500 people involved in school administration fired ...
I ask myself: but the government has decided that in Italy or if you are rich or you have to emigrate? Moreover, there will be about 131,900 people who lose their jobs in coming years.
I wonder: but there was just a different solution? And I always put this in relation to the salaries of those who govern Italy: it is not right to earn so much and do not know how to heal the country's economy, because the blame for our poverty depends on their misdeeds.
0 comments:
Post a Comment