The crisis of the Second Republic and the ambiguities of "radical left"
The day will fall the Second Republic, few will mourn. Con ogni probabilità è stato il periodo più buio ed infausto della storia repubblicana, non solo perché ha coinciso con il lungo e vergognoso ciclo berlusconiano, bensì perché ha rappresentato una iattura per la partecipazione delle masse popolari alla vita politica nazionale e una maledizione per la stessa democrazia rappresentativa borghese.
In questo senso la Seconda Repubblica è stata devastante, nella misura in cui ha eroso i diritti e gli interessi delle classi subalterne, sempre più estranee e distanti dai teatrini del Palazzo, e minato le basi, incompiute e vulnerabili, dello stato sociale italiano.
Inoltre, i vantaggi promised, that the stability of government, had no effect and the Town has proved more intractable than before. The corruption of politics is even more pervasive than the previous regime. Not to mention the transformation, an atavistic evil irreducible. Just think all'ignobile cattle market (no offense to cows) that have seen during the vote of confidence on 14 December.
But back to the issue of political freedom. The electoral system, based on the law called "porcellum" combines the worst defects of the majority system and than proportional. Besides what has been destroyed once the proportional system in terms of guaranteed freedom of choice and of political representation and electoral, namely "pleasure" to attend their like or who they preferred, electing Who really represents us, the political references or the most reliable.
pure proportional system, despite the limitations and weaknesses, so that all (or almost) to be represented politically, while today the majority of the population is not real and does not feel represented in the institutions . Not by chance is a marked increase il tasso di astensionismo elettorale consapevole. E ciò è senza dubbio un bene.
A dirla tutta, questo fenomeno non dipende tanto dalla legge elettorale, quanto dal fatto che in un regime capitalistico come quello attuale, le libertà democratiche sono oggettivamente ridotte e mortificate dall’ingerenza delle oligarchie tecnocratiche e finanziarie sovranazionali, vale a dire dai centri di controllo della finanza globalizzata.
La politica ufficiale ha perso la sua credibilità in quanto la gente si rende conto di non riuscire ad incidere in alcun modo sul proprio destino, a meno che non si organizza autonomamente in un movimento di massa. Awareness is growing that the intervention in the institutional life does not pay as pagan mass mobilizations.
The disconnect between the company and the building is a fact all too evident and stems from many reasons, especially the closure of the self-bourgeois representative institutions, which do not have to account to the people that "elect" ; , but the technocratic elites that dominate the level of parliamentary bodies and the Liberals.
The separation of politics and "civil society" has also invested and above the left. In fact, the divorce between the popular masses, historically placed on the left, and the traditional parties of the left, or their heirs official discourse is a larger and more complex. This is likely to have originated in a series of events dating back to the 80s and then the 90s, when mass parties representing the left, starting with the PCI, have gradually become completely bourgeois, zoning more from the collective and the popular sentiment that animate the lower classes.
The vacuum has been created, in part was occupied and filled by "populism" the Northern League, but in most positions is expressed through protest and electoral turnout, which in fact represent a phenomenon that is becoming more conscious and mass.
In today's political landscape looks naked who tries to fill, or at least reduce, the gap between the "people" by left-wing political formations. Consider the case of Nichi Vendola, which expressly show their willingness to establish a "emotional connection" with his "people" . For electoral purposes obviously.
A parte i settori che nel Partito Democratico sono conniventi con gli interessi del capitalismo bancario e confindustriale, si pensi alla ambiguità che fanno capo alla cosiddetta "sinistra radicale" , in particolare la Federazione della Sinistra , i cui dirigenti nazionali si attestano su posizioni incerte e poco trasparenti, adiacenti al governismo, che suscitano l’imbarazzo di numerosi elettori e militanti della base. Sorge il fondato sospetto di un appiattimento su una linea priva di una coerente identità classista, distante rispetto ad una scelta di campo apertamente proletaria ed anticapitalista.
Mi riferisco explicitly to the senior managers of the PRC, or how the heck you call the new political entity was born on the left, to those who have left adrift (ideological and political) and thousands of fellow activists who packed the clubs territorial base, which no longer has a 'cultural identity accurate, they do not know how to define themselves and no longer have reference values \u200b\u200bto which theoretical and practical grasp.
The crucial question to ask is: what is this Federation of the Left? An organization of communist-style, or aristo-communist un movimento radical-chic e democratico borghese? Un partito riformista? O semplicemente un cartello elettorale?
E’ evidente che si tratta solo di una forzatura dettata dall’attuale contingenza politica, cioè da una ristrutturazione dello scenario parlamentare allo scopo di eliminare i partiti minori. Partitini che alla prova dei fatti si sono rivelati assolutamente deboli, subalterni e impotenti rispetto ai condizionamenti esercitati dai poteri forti: il capitalismo bancario e finanziario, l'establishment militare nordamericano, il Vaticano e via dicendo.
E’ evidente che un rinnovamento effettivo is impossible if it is conceived as a replacement of the vertices of the nomenclature, while more serious problems to be remedied, as defeat the "evil" opportunism and careerism assaulting bureaucrats and party officials, to eliminate the contradictions inherent in a political force corrupt bourgeois ideology. No need to renew the management staff if then the methods of management, organization and operation are practically the same as in the past.
Lucio Garofalo
0 comments:
Post a Comment